-
January 13th, 2008, 12:53 AM
#1
Inactive Member
I recently pick up a pair of "Stanly Screamrer's". 604 HPLNs/288/94's. **** they are graet. Beats the .. out of my 2245/515/1005/828's.
Jim N
-
January 13th, 2008, 01:31 AM
#2
Senior Hostboard Member
which one exactly? got a pic?
I found this page of ss types:
catalog page 3
-
January 13th, 2008, 01:51 AM
#3
Senior Hostboard Member
Most probably this one
http://www.audioheritage.org/html/re...photos/s&c.htm
...............
<font color="#FFFFFF" size="1">[ January 12, 2008 09:52 PM: Message edited by: CONVERGENCE ]</font>
-
January 13th, 2008, 02:05 AM
#4
Senior Hostboard Member
They also offered a system with dual 604HPLN in the 817 horn box and 288/94 as a mid component.
Bottom right, shown without the 288 and horn.
http://www.lansingheritage.org/image...mer/page02.jpg
-
January 13th, 2008, 06:00 PM
#5
Inactive Member
I'll bite, Jim. What in particular outshines the 828s?
-
January 13th, 2008, 06:27 PM
#6
Inactive Member
Mine are in the 817 cabs with 288G/MR94's. They make better and lower bass than the 2245 sub in the bottom of the 828. I, also, like the 94's better than the 1005 but not by much.
JIm N
-
January 13th, 2008, 06:43 PM
#7
Senior Hostboard Member
Mine are in the 817 cabs with 288G/MR94's. They make better and lower bass than the 2245 sub in the bottom of the 828. I, also, like the 94's better than the 1005 but not by much.
JIm N
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">By placing the 2245 at the bottom of the 828 you defeat the purpose of the bass reflex properties of the 828. The 2245 should have their own enclosure. The A-5 is an oustanding speaker that will give you as much oumph than the 817
cabs.
......................
-
January 13th, 2008, 08:29 PM
#8
Senior Hostboard Member
Hmm- my experience has been the opposite- the 817's go lower than the claaic VOT.
To be fair to both cabs we would need to try different drivers and tuning. Just wanted to say the 817's worked better for me- but I would use subs with either.
-
January 13th, 2008, 08:39 PM
#9
Senior Hostboard Member
I found plans for the 2245 if your interested.

...............................
-
January 13th, 2008, 10:34 PM
#10
Inactive Member
Originally posted by CONVERGENCE:
By placing the 2245 at the bottom of the 828 you defeat the purpose of the bass reflex properties of the 828.
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">That's the point of doing it. Replace a boom-boom cavity resonance with a linear driver.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
This forum has been viewed: 24479663 times.
Bookmarks